I have discovered that it is easy to recognize when something is not  right, but it is much more difficult to ask ‘why’ something is not  right.  Asking ‘why’ can be difficult because it may lead us to discover  things that may change the course of our entire lives, as well as  challenge our pre-conceived ideas that we consider normal and  comforting.  This article is not only an attempt to address a very  important and dangerous problem within institutional Christianity, but  to ask ‘why’ this problem exists and keeps repeating itself.
   I would like to ask you to read this article with an open mind. If you  feel led, contribute your disagreement in a constructive way and add to  the discussion by sharing your thoughts.  If you indeed love the church  (people), then we really do have the same goal.
Often times the problem I’m going to share is perpetuated by the same  people who would agree that the problem exists.  I would like to  address the very serious problem of ‘factions’ (mistakenly called ‘local  churches’) and why they exist.  Let me explain…
Have you ever drove down a street (especially in the Bible belt) and  noticed all the different ‘churches’ on all the different street  corners?  I know that I have, and it has perplexed me most of my  Christian life.  A couple of years ago, we moved from Columbus, Ohio to  the ‘Bible Belt.’  God used this experience to open my eyes to some  disturbing things that exist almost everywhere in this country, but is  more visible and severe in the ‘Bible Belt’ so to speak.  There was one  stretch of road in the area that we moved to that literally had a church  building every tenth of a mile.  Sometimes they were even side by side!   Some were big, some were small, and some were medium sized.  Many of  these buildings also had some type of pithy advertisement outside  (advertising a sermon topic or some famous worship leader / speaker  coming) that seemed to plead to people driving by to come to their 1.5  hour meeting that Sunday.
The competition seemed very stiff to say the least as each  institution was desperately trying to get more & more people to  ‘attend’ their weekly meetings.  Some of these institutions tried to  appeal to a younger crowd, while some emphasized their more traditional  meetings to appeal to an older crowd.  This is right in keeping with the  American consumer and shopping culture. When one institution’s weekly  meetings weren’t good enough, people simply left and went down the road  to something better.  While most institutional Pastors would agree this  is a huge problem, most are also blind to the fact that their own system  and understanding of the church is actually what keeps perpetuating the  very thing they say they stand against.
If you’re like me, you have probably wondered how things got like  this.  After all, aren’t we all supposed to be one family?  I have often  wondered how these groups justify being separate from one another when  they are, in some cases, literally right next to each other. (I know of  one specific cinema that has 3 separate ‘church’ services in 3 separate  theaters in the same building at the same time!  This is no joke.)    Rarely do the people, who attend the Sunday church meetings at one  facility, have any meaningful fellowship with people who attend the  facility next to them.  If someone is asked why they don’t connect with  anyone at the ‘church’ facility down the street, you might hear an  answer like this:
“I am pretty involved in (enter church name here), and they ‘go’ to a  completely different church.  Why should I be involved with someone  else from a different church?”
Although this type of behavior and attitude is normal today, it  doesn’t take a theologian with a PhD to see that there is absolutely no  example of anything like this in the New Testament.  Even the people  that I have talked to who are not Christian seem to know that there is  something wrong with this picture.  How can something that is supposed  to be ‘one’ be so divided in identity and practice?
As a result, some ‘churches’ have attempted to fix this problem by  trying to ‘collaborate’ a bit more.  Recently while visiting a  particular city in the Bible belt, I visited a very well known ‘church’  and had a conversation with one of its staff members.  When the subject  came to other churches in the area, the conversation went something like  this:
ME: “So, are there many churches in this area?”
CHURCH STAFF: “Oh yes, there are many.”
ME: “Would you say there is much interaction between the churches in this area?”
CHURCH STAFF: “Oh yes, our Pastor really has a heart to work with the other churches in the area.” (said with excitement and a big smile)
ME: “Oh yeah, how’s that?”
CHURCH STAFF: “Well, we actually have an entirely  different church that we let use our very own building for their weekly  services and staff offices.”
ME: “Wow. That’s unheard of and quite generous.” (Tongue in cheek)
CHURCH STAFF: “Yeah, our Pastor really has a heart for all the churches in this area.” (more excitement and smiles)
ME: “Can I ask you a question?”
CHURCH STAFF: “Yes, sure.”
ME: “Is it a different church that you let use your building, or the same church?”
CHURCH STAFF: “Like I said, it is a completely  different church. We like to work with other churches.” (Still smiling,  but less enthusiastically)
ME: “I see. And you said that this is a completely different church that uses the same building?”
CHURCH STAFF: “Yes, that’s right.” (confused look)
ME: “Do you know why the church that meets on your property is not the same church, but a different church?”
CHURCH STAFF: “Well, because it is a completely different church.” (a more confused look)
ME: “Well I know that you said that it is a  completely different church, but do you know what it is exactly that  makes it a completely different church? After all, it is not location  that keeps you guys separate because you guys are so close in proximity  that you use the exact same building.  So again, why are these two  churches different churches?”
CHURCH STAFF: “Well…umm…(possibly thinking about  this for the first time) because we have a completely different set of  leaders, and different missional and doctrinal stances.  They even have  their own marketing materials as well.”
Bingo!  That was the answer I was looking for, and I was also hoping  this staff member would grasp the audacity of the situation. This is the  reason that these church communities believed they were actually  different ‘churches’.  It all comes down to different communities of  people being factioned around different sets of human leadership and  different doctrinal stances.  Again, it does not take a PhD in theology  to see that this kind of example is foreign to New Testament thinking  & teaching.  Can you imagine one group of Christians in the city of  Corinth saying they were a completely different church from another  group of Christians in the city of Corinth?  No way!
In the scriptures, you simply see the church of Corinth, Ephesus,  Rome, Sardis, etc…There was only one church in these cities, and these  churches were identified by which city they were located in, nothing  else. Yes, there were many different local church communities that met  in the same city (and no, they didn’t all meet together in one big  group), but they all considered themselves a part of the same church.   They didn’t organize around specific human leaders or doctrinal  affiliations, and they didn’t have different church names that  distinguished one group from another like we do today.  There is no  biblical evidence to support this practice.  It was simply the church of  Corinth for example. They all had Jesus in common, and He was the head  of their specific local fellowships as well as the larger church across  the city.  Local church groups were simply identified by location.  Church in Corinth was distinguished from the church in Ephesus because  of location.  Again, this had nothing to do with being factioned around a  different set of leaders or doctrinal positions. 
There was, however, a specific situation that arose with the church  in the city of Corinth when the church tried to separate from each other  and faction around 4 different leaders. One group wanted to be  identified as followers of Paul, another as followers of Apollos,  another as followers of Peter, and then there was the ‘super spiritual’  group that wanted to separate from the rest of the other groups and say  they were following Christ.  I’m sure these groups all had well sounding  arguments as to why they thought they needed to be a separate faction  from the others. I’m sure they liked these individual leaders and the  teachings (doctrines) that each seemed to emphasize.  That is why they  wanted to organize a separate group around these specific people.  This  is no different than what happens today as we form separate ‘churches’  around human leaders.  If Paul hadn’t stepped in, there would have been 4  different ‘churches’ in the city of Corinth.  We would do well to  consider Paul’s question to the Corinthian believers about this attempt  to divide the body of Jesus into factions:
“Has Christ been divided?…” (1 Cor. 1:13)
The truth is Christ has not been divided, and His very own body here  on the earth should reflect this glorious truth.  Unfortunately, this is  not practiced today. I know that this might sound harsh, but most of  what we call ‘church’ planting today is nothing more than ‘faction’  planting. It is NOT church planting. Yes, the church (people) can be  caught up in these ‘factions’, but what is really meant by ‘church’, is  simply just another faction.  How do I know this?  Because I have done  it!
I was trained and taught to be an institutional church planter  according to the system that was passed down to my spiritual leaders.   According to an institutional / factional understanding of the church,  one of the first things that must be accomplished when thinking about a  ‘church’ plant is the identification of a ‘point man’ or a human leader  whom the faction will be built around.  After all, who will lead this  thing?  Once the clergy figure is identified, then a faction of people  can be built around them.  Eventually there is a ‘mission’ or a  doctrinal stance that they begin to rally around.  Then they usually  pick a name for themselves to distinguish themselves from the other  ‘factions’ that are in their target area. Once they arrive at the city  of their destination, they have simply added to the number of other  ‘factions’ in the city that are calling themselves churches. This is a  tragedy and it should not continue to be repeated because it has no  Biblical precedent.  This violates the basic premise of what the local  church actually is.
So, what am I saying?  Am I saying that local churches should not be  planted?  No way!  I am saying that local ‘factions’ should not be  planted.  A local faction is built around a human leader(s) that rally  around a mission / vision for the city, or a set of doctrinal tenants.  (This is not a good thing no matter how noble the specific mission may  be).  A true local church must be planted around something much greater  and more profound.  Many people can agree and recognize that there is a  problem regarding the factional institutional ‘church’ culture that I  have mentioned in this article, but until we’re ready to recognize and  destroy the systems of thought that actually fuel these factions, (and  until we’re ready to do something about it), we’ll just keep  perpetuating and validating the problem.  The first step toward  understanding what a local church actually is, is understanding what  it’s not.  We need a repentance (change of mindset) regarding the very  nature of church itself before we will have eyes to see the Bride of  Christ as she truly is.
So, do you have a factional understanding of the church? 
I’d like to ask you to ponder some questions that may be revealing…
1. What is the basis of the relationship between you and others in  your local church community? Is the basis of the relationship the fact  that you both attend the same weekly meeting on Sunday or have  allegiance to the same human leader(s) (pastor) or institution? If you  answered yes to these questions, then you may have a factional  understanding of the church. The basis of your ‘church’ relationships  must be based on something greater and more profound.
2. When a brother or sister in Christ moves away or stops attending  your weekly 1.5 hour ‘church’ meeting, do you forget about them, stop  communicating with them, or stop viewing them as important family  members? If the answer is yes, then you may have a factional  understanding of the church. Our communication with them must be based  on something greater and more profound.
3. When a brother or sister (IN CHRIST) disagrees with you regarding  matters of doctrine, does that keep you from perceiving Christ in them  and from valuing them as fellow brothers and sisters?  Does this offence  make you angry and keep you from having fellowship with them?  If the  answer is yes, then you may have a factional understanding of the  church. You must be able to perceive something greater and more profound  in them.
4. Do you belong to a ‘church’ simply because you greatly respect or  have allegiance to a particular human leader or institution /  denomination?  If the answer is yes, then you may have a factional  understanding of the church. Your commitment to a local church community  must be based on something greater and more profound.
5. Are you aware that in New Testament times, there were occasions in  which local churches were planted by church planters who then left the  local church on their own BEFORE elders were present and recognized?   Sometimes it was years before church elders / leaders emerged and were  recognized.  Do you know how these churches functioned?  If you do not  know these things, it could be because you hold to a factional  understanding of the church.  The local church, as described in the New  Testament, was governed and led by someone greater and more profound.
6. Do you know what specifically (not generally) should hold Biblical  local church communities together? If the answer is no, it could be  because you have a factional understanding of the church. (HINT: A local  church community should never be held together by a membership  document, commitment to a human leader / institution, or a commitment to  a specific doctrinal stance since these things are Biblically foreign  ideas)
I hope some of these questions have been helpful for you.  Blessings to you as you embark on this journey of discovery.
For His glory in the church,
Jamal Jivanjee (Guest Blogger)
http://jamaljivanjee.com/